The day we calculated we had 40 days left before bankruptcy, I realized we weren’t just struggling with sales — we had a fundamental process problem that was undermining everything we’d built.

It was 2014, and our custom software development company had been operating for seven years. We had talented developers, we delivered quality code and our clients were generally satisfied with our technical work. Yet we remained what I’d call a “garage company” — unable to break through to sustainable growth despite our technical capabilities.

Join top CEOs, founders and operators at the Level Up conference to unlock strategies for scaling your business, boosting revenue and building sustainable success.

The technical excellence trap

Like many software companies founded by developers, we’d fallen into a common trap: believing that technical excellence would naturally translate to business success.

We’d spent years perfecting our coding practices, learning new frameworks and delivering solid software solutions. Our assumption was that good work would speak for itself. What we hadn’t realized at the time was that our internal processes were creating friction that technical skill alone couldn’t overcome.

Key warning signs we often ignored:

• Client relationships starting well but becoming tense during project progression
• Operating in reactive mode rather than a proactive communication
• Working hard but not getting referrals
• Difficulty predicting timelines despite technical competence

Identifying process gaps

We started examining our processes systematically and discovered that one of our big blind spots at the time was client communication during development. We were excellent at understanding technical requirements and delivering solutions, but we hadn’t developed effective ways to align with clients about progress, setbacks or changes.

This created a pattern where clients felt disconnected from their own projects, and often had wrong expectations. According to Project.co’s 2025 survey, 68% of people have stopped dealing with a company and moved to a competitor due to poor business communication skills, yet we were optimizing purely for technical outcomes.

Related: I’ve Owned Over 30 Businesses — Here’s How to Master the Art of Running More Than One Company at Once

The partnership management solution

Rather than implementing standard project management methodology immediately, we focused on what we called “partnership management” — actively managing client relationships alongside technical delivery.

Our partnership management strategy included assigning dedicated relationship managers to each project, implementing proactive communication rather than reactive updates, translating technical realities into business language and vice versa, focusing on alignment rather than just reporting status and developing templates for common scenarios such as scope changes, delays and onboarding.

The impact exceeded our expectations. Clients began expressing greater confidence in our work, even when projects encountered technical difficulties.

Creating a structure that works

As communication processes improved, we addressed other operational areas that needed structure. We adopted Scrum methodology but adapted it to include regular client involvement rather than treating it as an internal-only framework.

Key areas we improved included standardizing how we onboard new clients, creating consistent project kickoffs and milestone reviews, setting up clear processes for handling scope changes and technical issues, adding regular project reviews that incorporated client feedback and tracking both project delivery and the overall health of client relationships.

These changes helped ensure that every engagement started with a clear framework and continued with structured checkpoints to keep projects on track.

We also began measuring a broader range of metrics, including client satisfaction, communication frequency and relationship health. We were able to better understand how clients experienced our work, identify potential issues earlier and strengthen the trust and transparency that are critical to long-term partnerships.

Overcoming challenges

The transition wasn’t without difficulties. Some team members initially resisted additional structure, viewing it as bureaucracy.

The key was showing how the new processes actually made their work easier rather than harder. We kept systems flexible while maintaining consistency, and when we saw early improvements, we made sure to acknowledge them. Training everyone on the new communication and project management approaches took some time, but people gradually saw the benefits.

What I found interesting was how process improvements affected our internal culture. Having clearer systems reduced day-to-day confusion and freed up mental space for more creative and strategic thinking.

Measuring success

The changes didn’t happen overnight, but we started seeing meaningful progress that accumulated over time. Client satisfaction improved dramatically, our project timelines became much more reliable, and referral business grew substantially. Our team seemed genuinely happier and more engaged, too.

What started as operational fixes gradually transformed how we worked. By 2018, we’d evolved from a struggling garage company into an organization that caught the attention of potential acquirers. Our technical skills were still crucial, but it was the solid operational foundation — combined with other strategic improvements we’d made — that really made us attractive to potential partners.

Tips for growing software companies

Our experience suggests that process innovation can be as important as technical innovation, particularly during growth phases.

Here are some starting points for similar cases:

• Audit client experience from their perspective, not just technical delivery
• Identify communication gaps in your current project workflows
• Implement regular check-ins and reporting systems to keep everyone aligned on progress
• Assign relationship management responsibilities
• Measure client satisfaction alongside technical metrics
• Create templates for common scenarios to ensure consistency

The most valuable lesson may be that building sustainable business processes is itself a technical problem worth solving systematically — it just requires different tools and approaches than writing software.

The streets of Ramadi, Iraq, 2006. In the aftermath of a tragic friendly-fire incident that resulted in the death of an Iraqi soldier, Navy SEAL Task Unit Commander Jocko Willink faced a crucial leadership moment. Instead of pointing to the fog of war, communication breakdowns, or the multiple factors beyond his control, Willink did something unexpected: he took complete responsibility for the incident. This decision would later become the foundation of a leadership philosophy that has transformed organizations worldwide.

The principle that emerged – Extreme Ownership – is deceptively simple: leaders must own everything in their world, no exceptions. But this simplicity masks a profound truth about effective leadership that extends far beyond the battlefield.

The Heart of Extreme Ownership: Complete Accountability

In their extensive work with organizations through Echelon Front, Willink and fellow SEAL Leif Babin discovered that the principles that keep teams alive in combat translate powerfully to any leadership context. The fundamental question is always the same: are you willing to take complete responsibility for everything that impacts your mission?

This question was put to the test dramatically at Ford Motor Company in 2006. When Alan Mulally took over as CEO, the automotive giant was losing billions and heading toward potential bankruptcy. The company’s culture was known for executives protecting their turf and avoiding responsibility for problems.

In one of his first leadership meetings, Mulally introduced a new system requiring executives to use color-coding for project status reports: green for good, yellow for caution, red for problems. Week after week, despite the company’s dire situation, every executive showed all green indicators. Until one Thursday, when Mark Fields, a senior executive, marked several items in red.

The room fell silent, expecting punishment. Instead, Mulally began applauding. “That’s great visibility,” he said. “Is there anything we can do to help?” This moment marked the beginning of a cultural transformation at Ford. By creating an environment where taking ownership of problems was celebrated rather than punished, Mulally laid the groundwork for what would become one of the most remarkable turnarounds in business history. Ford became the only major U.S. automaker to avoid bankruptcy during the 2008 financial crisis.

Ego: The Leader’s Greatest Enemy

The same traits that drive many people to leadership positions – confidence, decisiveness, ambition – can become their greatest weaknesses. This paradox became clear during Microsoft’s transformation under Satya Nadella. Unlike his predecessors’ more forceful approaches, Nadella demonstrated that true strength comes from humility and ownership, not ego and authority.

When Nadella took over as CEO, Microsoft was seen as a fading giant, missing key technology trends and struggling with a toxic internal culture. He faced a crucial choice: defend Microsoft’s past successes or acknowledge its failures in mobile and cloud computing. By choosing humility over ego, admitting Microsoft’s missteps, and taking personal responsibility for transformation, he set a powerful example.

Nadella began by publicly acknowledging Microsoft’s failures in mobile and internet markets. More importantly, he took personal responsibility for transforming the company’s culture from “know-it-alls” to “learn-it-alls.” His approach echoes a core tenet of Extreme Ownership: the most effective leaders check their ego at the door.

This isn’t just philosophical – it’s practical. When leaders let ego drive decisions, they:

• Defend failed strategies rather than adapting
• Suppress bad news rather than addressing it
• Blame others rather than taking ownership
• Miss opportunities to learn and improve

Prioritize and Execute: The Art of Focus

In combat, SEALs face multiple, simultaneous, life-threatening problems. The principle that keeps them alive – Prioritize and Execute – applies just as powerfully in business and life. When everything seems urgent, true leadership means focusing on what matters most.

The Mayo Clinic’s transformation offers a perfect example. Facing declining patient satisfaction, increasing errors, and rising costs, leadership could have tried addressing everything at once. Instead, they prioritized one clear mission: putting patients first. This singular focus guided every other decision, from empowering nurses to redesigning processes.

Their approach followed the key steps of Prioritize and Execute:

1. Evaluate the highest priority problem
2. Develop a clear solution
3. Communicate the plan simply
4. Act decisively
5. Move to the next priority

This methodology proved transformative. By focusing on patient experience first, other metrics naturally improved. Staff engagement increased, errors decreased, and costs began to fall – not because these were directly targeted, but because they were natural outcomes of getting the main priority right.

Decisiveness Amid Uncertainty

Leadership often means making decisions with incomplete information. In combat, waiting for perfect intelligence can be deadlier than making decisions with limited information. The same principle applies in business and life – the cost of inaction often outweighs the risk of an imperfect decision.

When Anne Mulcahy took over as CEO of Xerox in 2001, the company was near bankruptcy with $17.1 billion in debt. She couldn’t wait for perfect market conditions or complete information. Instead, she:

• Made rapid decisions about restructuring
• Personally visited major customers to understand their needs
• Invested in R&D despite financial pressures
• Kept communicating openly with employees about challenges and progress

The key is understanding that decisiveness doesn’t mean recklessness. It means:

• Gathering available intelligence quickly
• Assessing risks and potential outcomes
• Making the best decision possible with available information
• Being ready to adjust as new information emerges

Decentralized Command: Empowering Excellence

The principle of decentralized command might seem counterintuitive – especially in high-stakes situations. Yet both military and business experience show that pushing decision-making authority to the lowest competent level improves both speed and effectiveness.

The Mayo Clinic’s implementation of their “Patient First” operating model demonstrates this principle perfectly. They empowered everyone – from surgeons to janitors – to take ownership of the patient experience. Nurses could call for help without fear of reprimand. Maintenance staff could stop procedures if they spotted safety concerns. Every employee was trained to see themselves as responsible for patient outcomes.

This approach works because:

• Those closest to the problem often have the best solutions
• Empowered teams move faster than those waiting for top-down decisions
• Personal ownership at every level drives better results
• Leaders can focus on strategic decisions rather than tactical ones

Building Systems of Ownership

Understanding Extreme Ownership principles is one thing; implementing them is another. The most successful implementations share common elements:

1. Start with Leadership When Alan Mulally transformed Ford’s culture, he began with his senior leadership team. Weekly business plan reviews became a ritual where executives practiced radical ownership and transparency. Only after the leadership team embraced these principles did they cascade through the organization.

2. Build Supporting Systems The Mayo Clinic created specific protocols that empowered staff to take ownership. These weren’t vague guidelines – they were clear systems that showed exactly what taking ownership meant in practice. This included:

• Clear decision-making authority at each level
• Specific protocols for escalating concerns
• Regular forums for sharing problems and solutions
• Recognition systems that rewarded ownership behavior

3. Measure and Adjust Successful implementation requires clear metrics. But rather than overwhelming leaders with data, focus on key indicators that directly reflect ownership principles in action. Look for:

Personal Application: Beyond the Workplace

The principles of Extreme Ownership extend beyond formal leadership roles. When facing a career setback, personal challenge, or relationship difficulty, the ownership mindset provides a clear path forward:

• Take responsibility for the current situation
• Identify what you can control
• Focus on solutions rather than blame
• Act decisively on what matters most
• Learn and adjust based on results

This approach is particularly powerful because it shifts focus from external circumstances to personal agency. Instead of asking “Why is this happening to me?” the question becomes “What can I do about this?”

Looking Forward

In an increasingly complex world, the principles of Extreme Ownership become more relevant, not less. Whether leading a military unit, running a company, or pursuing personal goals, success starts with taking complete responsibility for everything in your world.

This isn’t easy. It means embracing discomfort, checking your ego, and facing reality head-on. It means making decisions with incomplete information and taking responsibility for the outcomes. It means building systems that support ownership at every level.

But as examples from the battlefield to the boardroom demonstrate, it’s the surest path to exceptional performance. The question isn’t whether these principles work – the evidence is clear that they do. The question is: are you ready to take ownership of everything in your world?

The path forward begins with a decision. Not to be perfect, but to be responsible. Not to have all the answers, but to take ownership of finding them. In the end, Extreme Ownership isn’t just a leadership philosophy – it’s a commitment to excellence through absolute accountability.

Featured photo credit: Photo by Marco Bicca on Unsplash via unsplash.com