Index Funds – Live Laugh Love Do http://livelaughlovedo.com A Super Fun Site Tue, 02 Dec 2025 05:29:45 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9 Elon Musk’s $1 trillion pay package is just too rich http://livelaughlovedo.com/sad-if-not-damning-cathie-wood-blasts-the-proxy-firms-who-say-elon-musks-1-trillion-pay-package-is-just-too-rich/ http://livelaughlovedo.com/sad-if-not-damning-cathie-wood-blasts-the-proxy-firms-who-say-elon-musks-1-trillion-pay-package-is-just-too-rich/#respond Tue, 21 Oct 2025 01:21:32 +0000 http://livelaughlovedo.com/2025/10/21/sad-if-not-damning-cathie-wood-blasts-the-proxy-firms-who-say-elon-musks-1-trillion-pay-package-is-just-too-rich/ [ad_1]

Investor Cathie Wood, a long-time Tesla bull known for first investing in the company a decade ago at $13 per share, condemned the growing resistance to Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s potential $1 trillion pay package. Over the weekend, the ARK Invest CEO suggested the financial system that’s enabling the pushback against it is the one with the problem, not the company that wants to make the world’s richest man richer by such a magnitude.

Wood said in a Sunday post on X that it was “sad if not damning” that proxy advisory firms, which make recommendations for how shareholders should vote during companies’ annual meetings, have so much influence. Wood’s comments come after two of the most important proxy firms, Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) and Glass-Lewis, urged shareholders to reject during Tesla’s annual meeting on Nov. 6 the giant pay package that would give the world’s richest man 29% of the company, up from about 13% now.

Wood particularly criticized the relationship between these proxy firms and index funds, which have an outsized influence over voting because of the large number of shares they control for their investors. Each shareholder gets a certain number of votes based on how many shares they own. Yet, large institutional investors, including index funds, control massive amounts of shares held by their investors, which gives them sway over voting.

“Index funds do no fundamental research, yet dominate institutional voting. Index-based investing is a form of socialism. Our investment system is broken,” she added.

While Wood claims index funds don’t do research, their parent companies absolutely do. The three largest index funds in the world are managed by Vanguard, State Street, and BlackRock, and all three do extensive research for proxy voting decisions and have their own proxy voting guidelines that they publish. Also, those three funds hold over $2 trillion tracking the S&P 500 index and represent the vast majority of retail traders invested in the stock market. While index funds don’t do research to pick stocks, they utilize their research base for voting decisions.

Both proxy firms recommended shareholders vote against Musk’s pay package partly because it dilutes existing investors’ shares and gives Tesla’s highly compensated board too much flexibility when it comes to the goals Musk has to meet to get the full payout, which is about equal to the company’s total market cap.

In another series of posts, Wood added that ISS and Glass Lewis don’t see the potential in Tesla that ARK Invest does and seemingly suggested index funds should be stripped of their voting power. ARK Invest’s flagship ARK Innovation ETF’s largest holding is Tesla, which makes up about 12% of its $8 billion portfolio.

“I believe that history will decide that Glass Lewis and ISS have been menaces to innovation, enabling passive investors who care about ‘tracking errors’ to their indexes but do not care about much else,” Wood wrote in a post referring to how closely index funds track indexes such as the S&P 500.

Russell Rhoads, a clinical associate professor of financial management at Indiana University, said while investors in an active fund know its management may push for changes to a company if it is struggling, the same isn’t true for passive investors who put their money into index funds.

“In general, if I put money into a fund, that’s supposed to mirror the index, that is a passive investment,” he said. “I’m just investing in the market and not trying to influence anything what any other companies are doing business wise.”

Tesla, for its part, said in a Monday statement that the proxy firms aren’t considering the previous 2018 pay package approved by shareholders on two different occasions that allocated $56 billion to Musk over 10 years. Both ISS and Glass Lewis also recommended voters reject the 2018 pay package.

“Glass Lewis’s one-size-fits-all checklists undermine shareholders’ interests, including by opposing proposals designed to build long-term value at Tesla,” the statement read.

When reached for comment, representatives from Glass Lewis and ISS directed Fortune to their respective proxy papers on Tesla.

Prior to the proxy firms’ reports, the SOC Investment Group, which works with pension funds sponsored by major unions such as the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, as well as several parties with an interest in Tesla including state financial officers, signed a letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission urging shareholders to vote no on Musk’s pay package earlier this month. 

If Musk’s pay is approved and the three board members are reelected, “this year may be one of the last times that public shareholders have a meaningful voice in the Company and its leadership given the level of dilution that is likely to take place,” the letter argued.

Tejal Patel, the executive director of Tesla shareholder group SOC Investment Group, said despite the company claiming Musk needs more incentive to stay engaged with Tesla, Musk’s incentives should already align with the company whose shares represent the bulk of his $455 billion net worth. SOC has been vocally critical of Tesla and its corporate governance for multiple Musk pay packages on multiple grounds.

“We just don’t believe that these pay packages are going to really incentivize Mr. Musk to stay at Tesla, nor to be focused on Tesla over his other business endeavors,” Patel told Fortune.

Still, Wood said she was confident Musk’s pay package would pass, in part because of the support of retail investors, which hold about 40% of Tesla’s voting shares

“Although the proxy firm ISS has recommended against the package, retail investors are likely to dominate the vote once again. America!”

[This report has been updated to include a paragraph providing additional context on the extent of the major index funds’ research activities.]

[ad_2]

]]>
http://livelaughlovedo.com/sad-if-not-damning-cathie-wood-blasts-the-proxy-firms-who-say-elon-musks-1-trillion-pay-package-is-just-too-rich/feed/ 0
Understanding How Markets Create Long Term Value http://livelaughlovedo.com/understanding-how-markets-create-long-term-value/ http://livelaughlovedo.com/understanding-how-markets-create-long-term-value/#respond Sat, 11 Oct 2025 11:38:01 +0000 http://livelaughlovedo.com/2025/10/11/understanding-how-markets-create-long-term-value/ [ad_1]

Harvard MBA and FCLTGlobal CEO Sarah Williamson - expert in different types of investing such as long term investing, posing in front of the camera. Sarah Williamson is the kind of person who shapes the decisions that move trillions of dollars. She earned her MBA with distinction from Harvard Business School and holds both the CFA and CAIA designations, two of the most demanding credentials in finance.

In this episode, she helps us understand how investing really works, who the major players are, how capital flows through the system, and why the incentives driving investors, activists, and asset managers often collide.

Sarah spent more than twenty years at Wellington Management, where she rose to Partner and Director of Alternative Investments, after working at Goldman Sachs, McKinsey & Company, and the U.S. Department of State. Today she leads FCLTGlobal, an organization dedicated to helping companies and investors focus on long-term value creation. She is also the author of The CEO’s Guide to the Investment Galaxy.

She explains why index funds now dominate corporate ownership, how Reddit and retail traders changed the market’s dynamics, and what it means when activists push companies to “bring earnings forward.” She also introduces a framework for understanding the “five solar systems” of investing, a map that connects everyone from day traders to trillion-dollar sovereign wealth funds.

Whether you are a passive investor or simply curious about what drives the market, this episode gives you the clarity to see how capital really moves and why it matters.

Key Takeaways

  • Reddit and the meme-stock movement permanently changed how individual investors move markets. 
  • Index funds now dominate ownership, creating both stability and new corporate challenges. 
  • Activists often prioritize short-term profit over long-term innovation. 
  • Sovereign wealth funds act like national endowments, investing with century-long horizons. 
  • Understanding who owns what (and why) makes you a more informed, confident investor. 

Resources and Links

  • The CEO’s Guide to the Investment Galaxy by Sarah Williamson
  • FCLTGlobal, a nonprofit that helps companies and investors focus on long-term value creation.
  • More investing topics here.

Chapters

Note: Timestamps will vary on individual listening devices based on dynamic advertising segments. The provided timestamps are approximate and may be several minutes off due to changing ad lengths.

(00:00) Meet Sarah Williamson: CEO, CFA, Harvard MBA, global finance leader
(5:41) The five “solar systems” that organize the investing world
(7:55) Reddit and the rise of the retail investor
(16:25) Tesla, brand loyalty, and shareholder activism
(22:57) How sovereign wealth funds invest for generations
(28:57) Inside asset managers and their incentives
(41:56) Activist investors and the tension between short and long term

If you want to understand the real power dynamics behind modern investing, from Reddit traders to trillion-dollar endowments, don’t miss this episode.

subscribe on android afford anything


Thanks to our sponsors!

Policy Genius
Secure your family’s future with Policygenius. Head to policygenius.com to compare life insurance quotes from top companies and see how much you could save.


Quince
Find your fall staples at Quince. Go to quince.com/paula for free shipping on your order and 365-day returns.


Shopify
Sign up for your one month, one dollar per month trial period and start selling today at shopify.com/paula


Indeed
If you’re looking for amazing talent to bolster your team, you need Indeed. Go to indeed.com/paula and start hiring with a seventy-five dollar sponsored job credit.



[ad_2]

]]>
http://livelaughlovedo.com/understanding-how-markets-create-long-term-value/feed/ 0
My Company Gave Me $1,000 to Invest. Here’s Exactly What I’m Doing With It http://livelaughlovedo.com/my-company-gave-me-1000-to-invest-heres-exactly-what-im-doing-with-it/ http://livelaughlovedo.com/my-company-gave-me-1000-to-invest-heres-exactly-what-im-doing-with-it/#respond Sun, 24 Aug 2025 11:27:03 +0000 http://livelaughlovedo.com/2025/08/24/my-company-gave-me-1000-to-invest-heres-exactly-what-im-doing-with-it/ [ad_1]

I recently got a cool perk from my employer: $1,000 to invest however I want. The idea behind it is to help everyone at our company get familiar with investing, try out our internal tools, and learn about growing wealth with stocks.

I’ve dabbled in stock picking before — and let’s just say my win/loss ratio isn’t exactly Hall of Fame material.

So with this $1,000, I’m not rolling the dice or doing anything risky. I’m going back to the same boring-but-beautiful approach that’s worked for me all along… Index funds.

My “index and chill” strategy

I could spend hours analyzing charts, earnings reports, and news headlines. But I’ve tried that before and never found it either fun nor profitable.

So rather than chase individual stocks, I’m investing my money into a total stock market index fund — something like VTI (from Vanguard) or FZROX (from Fidelity). These index funds own thousands of companies across every sector, giving me instant diversification.

When the stock market goes up, my investment goes up too. When it drops, yeah, mine drops with it. But over time, the market’s gone up more than it’s gone down.

How my $1,000 could grow to $17,449

I’ve got a couple decades left on my investing horizon. So I’m trying to play the long game.

If this $1,000 investment grows at 10% annually (which is in line with the historical average return of the S&P 500) here’s what it could turn into:

Years Invested

Future Value

5

$1,610

10

$2,594

20

$6,728

30

$17,449

Data source: Author’s calculations.

Of course, markets fluctuate and there are no guarantees. But historically, the U.S. market has bounced back from every downturn — and gone on to hit new highs each time.

So while I’m not saying this $1,000 is destined for exactly $17,449 (let’s not jinx it), I like my chances betting on the market as a whole.

This bonus was wired straight into my brokerage account. I keep most of my investments at Fidelity, because it has no account fees, no trade fees, and a massive menu of index funds I can choose from.

Read my full Fidelity review here if you’re curious why I chose it (and how it stacks up for beginners or long-haulers).

Other cool things about index funds

It’s not just this $1,000. I put nearly all my long-term money into index funds.

They’re simple, but also really flexible. Here’s why I love investing in index funds:

  • They’re liquid — I can buy or sell anytime the market’s open, and in small or big amounts.
  • Easy to hold in any account type — I own index funds in my Roth IRA, my traditional IRA, 401(k), my brokerage account… even my health savings account (HSA).
  • Super low cost — With most brokerages, there are no trade commissions and no monthly account fees. Index funds also have low expense ratios.
  • No ongoing management — I don’t need to check on anything or do any maintenance.

Another cool thing is I can automate investments. So putting in new money to invest each month can happen automatically on a set schedule. Easy!

Investing is a long game

So that’s what I’m doing with my $1,000 bonus — the most boring thing in the world. Putting it into a low-cost index fund and just… letting it slowly compound.

This strategy has already panned out well for me over the years, and I’ve got no reason to switch it up now.

If you’re thinking about doing something similar with your own money — whether it’s $100 or $1,000 — you don’t need to overthink it. You just need a setup that’s simple, low cost, and built for the long haul.

Check out all our favorite top-rated brokers here, and find the one that matches your investment goals.

[ad_2]

]]>
http://livelaughlovedo.com/my-company-gave-me-1000-to-invest-heres-exactly-what-im-doing-with-it/feed/ 0
The Richest People Are Not Index Fund Fanatics – Why Are You? http://livelaughlovedo.com/the-richest-people-are-not-index-fund-fanatics-why-are-you/ http://livelaughlovedo.com/the-richest-people-are-not-index-fund-fanatics-why-are-you/#respond Fri, 18 Jul 2025 18:00:44 +0000 http://livelaughlovedo.com/2025/07/18/the-richest-people-are-not-index-fund-fanatics-why-are-you/ [ad_1]

I love index funds and ETFs for their low-cost nature and simplicity of ownership. However, if you want to build generational wealth before traditional retirement age, consider looking beyond just index funds and index ETFs.

Since starting Financial Samurai in 2009, I’ve written extensively about investment strategies, financial independence, and retiring earlier to do what you want.

Based on years of reader surveys and conversations, it’s clear this community is one of the wealthiest on the web. A significant portion of you have already surpassed the $1 million net worth mark, while many more are closing in. In comparison, the median household net worth in America is only about $200,000.

With this in mind, it’s time to acknowledge a simple truth: the richest people in the world don’t rely mainly on index funds and ETFs to build their fortunes. Instead, many use index funds primarily to preserve their wealth, not create it.

Why Index Funds Alone Aren’t Enough

Most of us love index funds for their simplicity, low fees, and historical returns. But if your goal is to achieve financial freedom before the traditional retirement age, or to reach a top 1% net worth, index funds alone probably won’t get you there before age 60.

To get rich sooner, you need either:

  • A massive amount of income to consistently invest large sums into index funds, or
  • To take more calculated risks in other asset classes

Simply put, index fund investing is best for capital preservation and slower, steadier growth. A potential 10% annual return is fantastic. But at that rate, your investment only doubles every 7.2 years. Hey, I’ll take it, and so would many of you. However, it’s simply not good enough for the richest people.

Your life is finite. Most of us only start working full time after age 18. Forty years might sound like a long time to build wealth, but trust me—it flies by. I’m 48 now, and I graduated college in 1999 at age 22. The past 26 years have zoomed past.

If I had only invested in index funds, I wouldn’t have been able to leave the workforce for good in 2012 at age 34. Don’t forget, there was a “lost decade” for both the S&P 500 and NASDAQ from 2000 to 2012. Relying solely on index funds would have delayed my financial freedom indefinitely.

Besides getting lucky, the only way to achieve financial freedom sooner than average is to take above-average risks by investing beyond index funds and ETFs. Looking back, I wish I had taken more risks.

The Average Rich Versus the Richest Rich

First off, if you’re rich—or feel rich—congratulations! You’re ahead of at least 90% of the world, which also means you’ve bought yourself more freedom than most. Although it’s tough, try not to let someone richer than your already-rich self get you down. The key is appreciating what you have.

That said, it’s important to distinguish between two types of rich, because they’re not the same. The personal finance community mostly focuses on the first kind—The Average Rich—partly because it’s easier to explain and attain, and partly because many financial creators don’t have finance backgrounds.

In fact, the lack of financial depth in the space was one of the main reasons I launched Financial Samurai in 2009. Back then, nearly every blogger only emphasized budgeting and saving their way to wealth. That’s solid advice for most people, however, I wanted to go beyond that. You can only do so much saving your way to wealth.

I wanted to escape the finance industry altogether and retire early. That’s when I started writing about FIRE for the modern worker. With the internet making it possible to earn and live in non-traditional ways, I saw an exciting opportunity to pursue a different lifestyle.

Ironically, it was 2009—during the global financial crisis—when the digital nomad trend really took off, as millions found themselves out of traditional jobs and searching for something new.

Now let’s definite the two types of rich people.

1. The Average Rich

This group includes individuals or households with investable assets between $1,000,000 and $5 million. They tend to be highly educated, dual-income professionals who max out their 401(k)s, invest in low-cost index funds, and own their primary residence.

Most of their investments are in public markets and real estate, and they typically feel financially stable but not truly rich. Some would describe this as the mass affluent class. Many started off or are HENRYs (High Earners Not Rich Yet), but then often slow down their pace of wealth accumulation once kids arrive.

You might think of the everyday rich person as someone with grey hair, a portly figure, and retiring around the more traditional age of 60–65. They’ve got a median-priced home and might fly Economy Plus if they are feeling particularly spendy. They aren’t eating at Michelin-star restaurants, except maybe for a rare special occasion, like a 30-year wedding anniversary.

The Average Rich know they’re wealthier than most, yet they still don’t feel rich. Instead, they feel closer to the middle class than to the truly wealthy.

2. The Richest Rich

These are the people with $10 million-plus in investable assets, often owning second and third vacation homes, flying first class, and making high six-figure or seven-figure investments. Their kids mostly go to private grade school, which they can comfortably afford without financial aid. They also freely donate significant sums of money regularly.

Instead of investing mostly in index funds to get rich, their money came from:

They might own index funds, but it wasn’t a driver for them to get rich. Instead, index funds are a place where they park their money, almost like a cash plus, until they find a potentially better opportunity.

20% plus or minus moves in the S&P 500 don’t phase them as the Richest Rich often experience much more volatile swings. In fact, the Richest Rich often have investments go to zero as they continuously fortune hunt for the next multi-bagger investment. So often, index funds and ETFs are a small percentage of their overall net worth (<20%).

The Richest Rich Tend To Be Seen as Eccentric

The Richest Rich are often viewed as eccentric, agitators, or downright weird by the general public. That’s because they tend to reject the status quo and do things their own way. As a result, they attract critics—sometimes lots of them—simply for not following societal norms.

They refuse to spend their entire careers working for someone else to make that person rich or organization rich. They aren’t spending a fortune to get an MBA only to work for someone else. Instead, they bet heavily on themselves through entrepreneurship and alternative investments. Index funds and ETFs? Boring. Too slow. These folks would rather build something from scratch or swing for the fences.

Many of the Richest Rich also go all-in on optimizing their bodies and minds. They train hard, eat clean, and track every metric they can—often in the hopes of staying fit enough to extend their grind and lifespan.

To most, they come across as quirky or intense. But from their perspective, it’s the rest of society that’s asleep, trapped in a system they’ve managed to escape.

Level of net worth needed to join the top 0.1% in selected countries (U.S., Monaco, Switzerland, Singapore) and more
Source: https://www.knightfrank.com/research/article/2021-03-01-how-deep-do-your-pockets-need-to-be-to-get-in-you-in-the-top-01-of-the-worlds-wealthiest

Real-World Net Worth Breakdowns

Here are a few anonymized examples of the Richest Rich:

Example 1 – $30 Million Net Worth

  • 30% ownership in business equity they started
  • 30% real estate
  • 20% public equities (65% individual stocks, 35% S&P 500 index funds)
  • 15% venture capital funds
  • 5% muni, Treasury bonds, cash

Example 2 – $300 Million Net Worth

  • 40% ownership in business equity they started
  • 20% real estate
  • 20% in other private companies
  • 15% stocks (half in index funds)
  • 5% cash and bonds
The top 1% by wealth in America versus Top 0.01%
Source: https://www.chicagobooth.edu/review/never-mind-1-percent-lets-talk-about-001-percent

Example 3 – $600 Million Net Worth

  • 5% ownership in a massive private money management firm as one of their senior execs
  • 15% real estate
  • 50% in other private companies
  • 10% stocks (half in index funds)
  • 20% cash & bonds (~$180 million at 4% yields a whopping $6.4 million risk-free a year today)

None of them got rich by only investing in index funds. Instead, index funds are simply a low-risk asset class to them where they can park money.

Net Worth Breakdown By Levels Of Wealth

Here’s a good net worth breakdown visualization by net worth levels. The data is from the Federal Reserve Board Of Consumer Finances, which comes out every three years.

Let’s assume the mass affluent represented in the chart below is at the $1 million net worth level. Roughly 25% of the mass affluent’s net worth is in their primary residence, 15% is in retirement accounts, 10% is in real estate investments, and 12% is in business interests.

In comparison, for the Richest Rich ($10M+), at least 30% of their net worth is in business interests. Intuitively, we know that entrepreneurs dominate the wealthiest people in the world. Therefore, if you want to be truly rich, take more entrepreneurial risks and investment risks.

The Richest People Are Not Index Fund Fanatics - Net worth composition by levels of wealth

Time + Greater Risk Than Average = Greater Than Average Wealth

Building meaningful wealth often comes down to how much risk you take—and how early you take it. When you’re young, lean into bigger bets. Invest in yourself. Build something. Own something beyond just index funds. If you lose money, you’ve still got time to earn it back—and then some.

If I could rewind the clock, I would’ve taken more calculated risks in my 20s and early 30s. Rather than playing it relatively safe, I would’ve gone bigger on business opportunities and leveraged more into real estate. I also would’ve made larger, concentrated bets on tech giants like Google, Apple, Tesla, and Netflix. The CEO of Netflix, Reed Hastings, spoke at my MBA graduation ceremony in 2006 when the stock was only $10 a share.

In addition, I would have started Financial Samurai in 2006, when I graduated business school and came up with the idea. Instead, I waited three years until a global financial crisis forced me to stop being lazy.

But honestly, I was too chicken poop to invest more than $25,000 in any one name—even when I had the capital to put $100,000 in each before 2012. The scars from the dot-com bust and the global financial crisis made me hesitant, especially after watching so many wealthier colleagues get crushed.

Still, I still ended up saving over 50% of my income for 13 years and investing 90% of the money in risk assets, most of which was not in index funds. I’ve had some spectacular blowups, but I’ve also had some terrific wins that created a step function up in wealth.

Don’t Be Too Easily Satisfied With What You Have

One of the keys to going from rich to really rich is pushing beyond your financial comfort zone—especially while you’re still young enough to bounce back from mistakes.

You’ve got to be a little greedier than the average person, because let’s face it: nobody needs tens or hundreds of millions—let alone billions—to survive or be happy. But if you’re aiming for that next level of wealth, you’re going to have to want it more and take calculated risks others won’t.

I was satisfied with a $3 million net worth back in 2012, so I stopped trying to maximize my investment returns. Big mistake. The economy boomed for the next 10 years, and I missed out on greater upside.

Then in 2025, after another short-term 20% downturn, I shifted my taxable portfolio closer to a 60/40 asset allocation. The temptation of earning 4%+ risk-free passive income was too strong. From a pure returns perspective, that’ll probably turn out to be another mistake long term.

To balance things out, I’ve deployed a dumbbell strategy—anchoring with Treasury bills and bonds on one end, while taking bolder swings in private AI companies on the other. And you know what? It feels great. I get to sleep well at night knowing I’ve got protection on the downside, while still participating in the upside if the next big thing takes off.

Final Thought On Investing In Index Funds And ETFs

Index funds are great. I own multiple seven figures worth of them. You should too. But they are best suited for those on the traditional retirement track or those looking to preserve wealth.

If you want to achieve financial freedom faster or join the ranks of the Richest Rich, you’ll need to invest beyond index funds. Build something. Take risks. Own more of your future.

That’s how the richest people do it.

Free Financial Analysis Offer From Empower

If you have over $100,000 in investable assets—whether in savings, taxable accounts, 401(k)s, or IRAs—you can get a free financial check-up from an Empower financial professional by signing up here. It’s a no-obligation way to have a seasoned expert, who builds and analyzes portfolios for a living, review your finances. 

A fresh set of eyes could uncover hidden fees, inefficient allocations, or opportunities to optimize—giving you greater clarity and confidence in your financial plan. The richest people in the world get regularly financial checkups.

The statement is provided to you by Financial Samurai (“Promoter”) who has entered into a written referral agreement with Empower Advisory Group, LLC (“EAG”). Click here to learn more.

Diversify Your Retirement Investments

Stocks and bonds are classic staples for retirement investing. However, I also suggest diversifying into real estate—an investment that combines the income stability of bonds with greater upside potential.

Consider Fundrise, a platform that allows you to 100% passively invest in residential and industrial real estate. With over $3 billion in private real estate assets under management, Fundrise focuses on properties in the Sunbelt region, where valuations are lower, and yields tend to be higher. As the Federal Reserve embarks on a multi-year interest rate cut cycle, real estate demand is poised to grow in the coming years.

In addition, you can invest in Fundrise Venture if you want exposure to private AI companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, Anduril, and Databricks. AI is set to revolutionize the labor market, eliminate jobs, and significantly boost productivity. We’re still in the early stages of the AI revolution, and I want to ensure I have enough exposure—not just for myself, but for my children’s future as well.

Fundrise investment amount by Financial Samurai, Sam Dogen. New $112,000 investment on June 20, 2025

I’ve personally invested over $400,000 with Fundrise, and they’ve been a trusted partner and long-time sponsor of Financial Samurai. With a $10 investment minimum, diversifying your portfolio has never been easier.

To increase your chances of achieving financial independence, join 60,000+ readers and subscribe to my free Financial Samurai newsletter here. Financial Samurai began in 2009 and is the leading independently-owned personal finance site today. Everything is written based off firsthand experience. 

[ad_2]

]]>
http://livelaughlovedo.com/the-richest-people-are-not-index-fund-fanatics-why-are-you/feed/ 0
#624: JL Collins Part 1: The Simple Path vs. The “Optimal” Path http://livelaughlovedo.com/624-jl-collins-part-1-the-simple-path-vs-the-optimal-path/ http://livelaughlovedo.com/624-jl-collins-part-1-the-simple-path-vs-the-optimal-path/#respond Fri, 11 Jul 2025 20:32:15 +0000 http://livelaughlovedo.com/2025/07/12/624-jl-collins-part-1-the-simple-path-vs-the-optimal-path/ [ad_1]

JL Collins doesn’t know what the efficient frontier is. The author of “The Simple Path to Wealth” — the guy synonymous with VTSAX and chill — admits this right off the bat when we challenge him with advanced investing concepts.

Collins joins us for Part 1 of a two-part series where we skip the basics and dive straight into the complex stuff. We grill him on whether his simple approach actually beats more sophisticated strategies, and his answer might surprise you.

He concedes that Paul Merriman’s four-fund portfolio probably outperforms his one-fund approach mathematically. But Collins argues that execution trumps optimization every time. Most people can’t stick with complex strategies for 20 years, especially when those strategies require selling winners to buy losers – something that goes against human nature.

Collins prioritizes what works in real life over what looks good on paper. He calls index funds “self-cleansing” because they automatically rotate out failing companies and sectors while rotating in the new winners. You don’t need to predict which companies will dominate next – you’ll own whatever rises to the top.

The episode covers his thoughts on VTSAX versus VTI, international diversification, and why he’d rather put Tabasco than Cholula on his eggs — his quirky way of explaining personal preferences in nearly identical investment options.

Resources Mentioned
Episode 31, Interview in 2016 with JL Collins

Timestamps:

Note: Timestamps will vary on individual listening devices based on dynamic advertising run times. The provided timestamps are approximate and may be several minutes off due to changing ad lengths.

(0:00) Intro

(1:00) JL admits he doesn’t know the efficient frontier

(2:00) Simple vs optimal but complex paths

(4:30) Paul Merriman’s four-fund portfolio vs VTSAX

(6:00) JL concedes Merriman’s approach is mathematically superior

(7:30) Risk parity investing discussion

(8:30) Sequence of returns risk and retirement bonds

(12:30) JL’s birthday email from Jack Bogle

(15:00) VTSAX vs VTI 

(17:00) Total stock market funds across brokerages

(23:30) Mag 7 concentration risk

(27:00) Sears story and self-cleansing index funds

(30:30) International diversification and US dominance

(39:00) World funds versus separate international

(45:00) When to shift to world fund

(47:30) Bond allocation timing strategies

(48:30) Target date funds 

(50:30) One-fund vs two-fund approach

(52:00) Historical diversification and Nifty 50

 

subscribe on android afford anything


Thanks to our sponsors!

Policygenius
Go to policygenius.com for free quotes and comparisons across more than 30 insurers. With Policygenius, you can find life insurance policies that start at just $276 per year for $1,000,000 of coverage.


ShipStation
Calm the chaos of order fulfillment with the shipping software that delivers. Switch to ShipStation today. Go to ShipStation.com and use code PAULA to sign up for your FREE trial.


Shopify
Diversify your business by selling physical and digital products through Shopify’s all-in-one platform. Every 28 seconds an entrepreneur makes their first sale on Shopify! Go to shopify.com/paula for one-dollar-per-month trial period for one month.


Quince
Quince offers a range of high-quality items at prices within reach. Go to Quince.com/paula for free shipping on your order and 365-day returns.


Indeed
If you’re looking for amazing talent to bolster your team, you need Indeed. Go to indeed.com/paula and start hiring with a seventy-five dollar sponsored job credit.



[ad_2]

]]>
http://livelaughlovedo.com/624-jl-collins-part-1-the-simple-path-vs-the-optimal-path/feed/ 0