Are you someone like me whose entire life revolves around their desktop PCs? Do you work, study, game, and watch movies all from a single computer? If yes, having separate OSes for each of your workflows might help you become more organized and productive. Here’s a complete breakdown of how I benefit from running a quad-boot PC.

Why a PC Running a Single OS Wasn’t Cutting It for Me

I know it might not be fashionable anymore, but I’m a desktop-first user. While everyone’s working on laptops and smartphones, chasing compact form factors and portability, I prefer working at my desk, sitting on a chair, having a big screen (maybe two) to look at, and a beefy system powering it all!

Credit: Dibakar Ghosh / How-To Geek

This is where I do my work, personal projects, play games, and even host multiplayer FIFA sessions or movie nights when friends come over.

My life essentially revolves around this PC, but that has created a big problem. When I sit down to work—I’m tempted to play games, and when I play games or watch movies—I get work notifications that don’t let me relax or wind down. As a result, I have a system that is powerful enough to do everything, but it doesn’t let me do anything with focus.

I’ve tried every single conventional focus trick to solve this issue, and the best solution was to break up my workflow into dedicated systems, or more precisely—dedicated OSes. Having one OS specifically for work and another for play ensures that when I sit down to do one thing, I’m doing that thing—because turning off an OS to boot into another is the perfect amount of friction to help me stay focused.

But Why Four Operating Systems?

I initially started out with a dual boot system—one OS for work and another for play. I liked it so much that I upgraded to a triple boot setup, adding another OS specifically for testing and experimentation—so I wouldn’t break my main systems!

Lately, I’ve added a fourth OS to turn my system into a HTPC (Home-Theater PC) that I boot into when I have friends over! It also gives me the peace of mind that when I go to the bathroom, they won’t access my PC to view my personal stuff (they’re a nosy bunch)—because there’s nothing on it but media!

What Are the Four Operating Systems I Run?

After nearly a decade of using Linux and testing dozens of distributions, I’ve settled on these four OSes that perfectly divide my computing needs into distinct, focused environments.

Garuda Linux as My Main Personal PC

After distro-hopping through tons of Linux distributions over the years, I finally settled on Garuda Linux—and I’ve been daily driving it for the past four years. As an Arch-based distro, it follows a rolling-release cycle, which satisfies my need for immediate access to cutting-edge updates.

Furthermore, thanks to the Garuda Rani app, you can run pre-configured routine maintenance scripts with a single click—making it a very low-maintenance Arch distro! The distro is also optimized for gaming and flawlessly runs all the games I like, even AAA Windows games.

This makes Garuda my go-to system for personal projects, playing video games, and watching movies. It’s also where I keep my digital journal and do all my research work. Overall, if I am on my desktop and have no particular agenda, I’m logged into Garuda because I just love being there!

Bazzite as an HTPC

Technically, I could just use Garuda to play games and movies, and I do—but only when I am by myself! When I have friends over for FIFA night or watching movies, I boot into Bazzite and this is for three specific reasons!

First, it helps me safeguard all my personal files since my friends are a nosy bunch, and I know they’ll be browsing through my journals and files if and when I leave the room. Since none of my personal stuff is on Bazzite, I don’t need to worry.

Second, I know I’m safe from any mischief they might have planned. Even if they do learn some system-breaking Linux commands to play a prank, it won’t work because Bazzite is immutable—which makes it extremely difficult to mess with the core system files.

Finally, Bazzite is optimized to be used as a HTPC. When I turn it on, it will boot into Steam Console mode—ready for gaming. I can control the OS from afar, sitting on my couch with just my gamepad. I have also installed Kodi and use the system for watching movies and TV shows.

Windows 11 for Work

Theoretically, if you’re multi-booting to segregate work and play, it makes more sense to use the Windows partition for gaming—since Windows is known to have better compatibility with video games. However, as I just said, all the games I like run perfectly on Linux. Furthermore, I’m not a Windows fan, and ideally wouldn’t be running it at all. The only reason I have it installed is that I need it for work—and so that’s what I use it for!

As a tech writer, I’m often writing tutorials on Windows and comparing it to Linux. I don’t want to be unfair and biased in my writings, and actually using Windows allows me to write practical and credible pieces. The first-hand experience has allowed me to come up with practical takes on why someone might switch to Linux from Windows and highlight powerful Linux features that Windows users don’t even know exist!

Ubuntu for Testing

Last but not least, we have Ubuntu—which I use to run all my tests and experiments without worrying about breaking my main system. Furthermore, as someone who writes about Linux, staying informed about the most popular Linux distribution (i.e., Ubuntu) is necessary.

Now, some of you might ask why I don’t just run Ubuntu on a virtual machine, and here’s the thing—VMs tend to be laggy, and some Ubuntu updates can make the OS sluggish. When testing a new Ubuntu release, I want to know for sure what’s actually causing the performance issue—the VM or the update! Moreover, virtualizing Ubuntu might be okay for testing light apps, but it’s not a good solution for testing more graphically demanding apps, which can cause the VM to crash.

How I Set Up and Manage a Quad Boot System

If you know how to create a dual-boot system, setting up a quad boot is essentially the same process—just repeated more times. The key difference is that with four operating systems, organization becomes critical from the start.

Deciding Where to Install the OSes

Credit: Lucas Gouveia / How-To Geek | Anton Marchenkov / Shutterstock

The first and most critical advice is to never install all four operating systems on the same drive as it can potentially cause data corruption. For the most seamless experience, I’d recommend as many OSes on separate drives as possible. The setup doesn’t need to get too expensive. You can have each OS on a 250GB SSD, and then a 1 or 2TB shared drive that all the OSes can access. See our guide on how to share files between Linux and Windows to learn more.

I personally have a 500GB NVME SSD for Windows, paired with a 1TB SATA SSD for both Garuda and Ubuntu, each occupying around 500GB of space. Then I have another 2TB SATA SSD for Bazzite, where I also store all my games and movies. You can go for an HDD instead of an SSD to save on costs—however, keep the OSes on an SSD for smoother performance.

Also, if you do decide to install all Linux OSes on a single drive, I’d strongly encourage that you manually partition them beforehand instead of relying on the “install alongside” option. This will prevent the installer from making arbitrary space allocations for the distros, and you’ll get to decide how much space you want to give to the OSes based on your actual usage needs.

The Order of Installation Matters

The operating system that you install last will automatically control the bootloader. Now, you want the Linux bootloader, typically GRUB, to control the boot process because it can read all OSes and boot into any one of them—a level of convenience we want from a multi-boot system. Installing Windows last would mean the Windows Boot Manager controls the booting process. This would result in your PC auto-booting into Windows, without giving you a chance to pick any of your other OSes.

You Need to Maintain an Update Schedule

You need to update your OSes following a steady schedule because an outdated OS is an insecure OS. This means the more OSes you have, the more vigilant you need to become about system updates. Here’s how I do it.

First, I only run one rolling-release distro (Garuda in my case), since they require weekly system updates. Having more than one would mean I’d be forced to boot into a distro just to update it—which isn’t something I’m willing to do.

Stable-release distros don’t require weekly updates, but I’d still recommend updating them once a month. I generally keep a reminder for the first Sunday of every month, when I update both Ubuntu and Bazzite along with Windows.

There you have it—a complete breakdown of my quad-boot PC setup: why I do it, how I do it, and which OSes I run. If you resonate with any of the “whys” behind this setup, then definitely give it a try. It should help you become more organized, productive, and also add that wow factor to your desktop!

Depending on how you count them, there have been 15 major versions of Windows, with Microsoft’s inconsistent naming scheme resulting in the current version of Windows being Windows 11—go figure.

A lot has changed from the first version of this graphical operating system to today, but so much of what’s in Windows 11 today has been there from the start, or close to it. So I thought it would be interesting to point out the bits of Windows DNA that have been largely unchanged since the world first booted up Windows 1.0.

6

Windows Has Always Had…Windows

This might seem like the most obvious observation, but from day one Windows has had, well, windows. In Windows 1.0, different apps were in their own windows and could run at the same time. Windows could not yet overlap, but instead they would tile next to each other. In Windows 2.0, with more screen real estate and better graphics technology, windows could overlap.

Oddly enough, while tiling has also been there since the start, it only became genuinely useful with the advent of high-resolution displays and quality of life features such as window snapping and quick tiling templates.

Related

How I Use Windows 11’s Snap Layouts to Streamline Multitasking

Navigate multiple apps at once!

5

The Mouse as a Primary Input Device

Windows 1.0 was one of the first operating systems to be designed under the assumption that you’d have a mouse attached. While plenty of MS-DOS applications supported a mouse, Windows needed one to work as intended.

Of course, you can use Windows 1.0 and all subsequent versions of the OS without a mouse if you really have to. I once had to use our Windows 95 computer without a mouse for a year, because ours broke, and we couldn’t afford a new one for a while. I still use those keyboard shortcuts to this day.

That said, Windows is a pain with a keyboard only, and today it’s best to augment your mouse-based controls with a few tasty keyboard shortcuts. The age of Windows and its competitors heralded the time of the rodent, and it’s probably going to stay with us for a while yet.

Related

13 Windows Keyboard Shortcuts I Couldn’t Live Without

There’s a shortcut for everything!

4

Menu Bars and Dropdown Menus

One important part of early graphical operating systems like Windows 1.0 is that they standardized the way different apps by different software developers operated. Under DOS, every app developer had their own take on how, for example, mouse-driven menus should work. On Windows, two word processors from different creators would have menu bars and dropdown menus that worked the same across the OS.

While we’ve had plenty of experiments with ribbons, sidebars, hamburger menus, and more, the top-level menu structure of applications in Windows today is still fundamentally the same as they were at the beginning.

Related

I Finally Upgraded to Windows 11 and I Actually Like It

Once you iron out a few details, it’s actually not bad.

3

Minimize, Maximize, and Close Controls

In Windows 1.0, you could minimize, maximize, and close Windows using controls that wouldn’t feel too familiar to modern Windows users, but from Windows 2.0 and later these controls started to become more like the trio of buttons we all know and love today.

While Microsoft has bloated those controls a little with more functions and options, the fundamental window management controls are still the same, and I think any modern Windows user could figure out even Windows 1.0 in just a few minutes. After all, the big selling point of these new graphical operating systems was that you didn’t have to be a computer geek who memorized a bunch of commands to use a computer.

With easy-to-use buttons on each window, you can now flip between windows efficiently, though ironically, I personally mainly use my keyboard these days to flick between virtual desktops and cycle between open windows using Alt+Tab.

Related

Why I Refuse to Buy Another Windows PC

I haven’t seen the appeal for over ten years.

2

Multitasking

Under MS-DOS, you have to close one program in order to work on another. One of the biggest innovations and productivity superchargers in Windows 1.0 was the ability to run multiple apps at the same time. Of course, since the computers of the time only had a single CPU core, “multitasking” was really just an illusion. However, the CPU switched between tasks so quickly that, from your perspective, your programs were all running at the same time.

Most importantly, this meant you could quickly switch between your programs, move data between them, and keep them all open and handy. Assuming you had enough memory or didn’t mind waiting for data to swap from your secondary storage. Today, Windows 11 is a multitasking monster, running hundreds or thousands of processes in the background, and, of course, thanks to technologies like hyperthreading and our massive multicore CPUs, multitasking isn’t a clever trick anymore. My Windows laptop has 24 cores!

Related

This Intel CPU Has 86 Cores

The best CPU you can’t use.

1

Notepad, Paint, and Calculator

With MS-DOS, you didn’t really get anything more than the basic applications you needed to operate the computer and run software. Think of utilities like CHKDSK or FORMAT. In Windows 1.0, Microsoft threw in a bunch of value-added software along with the operating system itself. Notable among these were Notepad, MS Paint, and Calculator.

Since then, every version of Windows has included these apps, and they are still useful and actively used by millions of people despite third-party attempts at offering alternatives. I’ve always used MS-Paint in every version of Windows to do basic image editing, and I still edit and annotate screenshots using it today. The calculator? It’s only become more sophisticated over time, and now you get a full scientific and graphics calculator thrown in with Windows. A graphing calculator is still a pretty expensive device to this day!

Related

Missing MS Paint on Linux? Here’s 5 Alternatives to Try

Here’s a few ways to scratch your Microsoft Paint itch on Linux.

I think we don’t really consider the value that these applets add to Windows, especially MS Write, which was later replaced by MS WordPad in Windows 95. These basic word processors were more than enough for me to complete my school projects and assignments without the need for our family to buy expensive office suites.

While so much of the core experience on Windows is still the same, what the future will hold is anyone’s guess. Obviously, other popular desktop operating systems all now look and operate more or less the same. Windows “borrowed” a lot from macOS, and the reverse is also true. Today, Linux distros and ChromeOS are all competing for the same niches. Will there still be Windows in a decade? I can’t say for sure, but if there’s a Windows 12,13, or 100, I bet it will still have MS-Paint!